The lesson began and all the groups were chosen by the students and finalized by the teacher. My group members were Mitchell Atkins, Jordan Ross, Bradley Cini, Jackson Foley and Tim McKay. The task was handed out to the group and immediately everyone jumped straight into the task and not long into the task two leaders emerged. The Scenario involved a very near nuclear holocaust. We had to choose six people out of a list to go into a bomb shelter and survive after the disaster. The two leaders went straight in and started discussing and taking in everyone's ideas one by one. Not all Group members were co-operating as well as others and didn't seem to be taking the task seriously. The two leaders decided to form a filter between who's go it was to talk by going around one by one and everyone got to voice their opinions and everyone would discuss the pros and cons of their decisions. The final outcome of our group for the six people to go into the shelter was The Doctor, Farmer, Student, Ministers Wife (pregnant), Police Officer and finally the Builder. The reason our group decided on the Doctor was because if there was to be any sicknesses or injuries to anyone the doctor would be crucial and would be needed to deliver the baby from the minister's wife. The farmer was our second choice as farming would be the easiest and most resourceful way of getting food when there is not food left and it would be easier and safer then hunting which was our other alternative to the farmer but the group decided farming was the way to go. The student was a very discussed person as at first not everyone agreed on the student but the point that the student could be taught anything by all of these other survivors and the fact that she is only still young confirmed her place in the Bomb shelter. The minister's wife who was pregnant was an easy decision for everyone as bringing a pregnant lady into the shelter would mean one extra survivor although she wo