The Winter Olympic Games in Sochi had just finished and it was the most expensive Olympics ever. Why they were controversial and caused passionate discussion concerning human rights? Every day we could read news and articles about criticism of organizing Olympics in Sochi, especially because of violating human rights and non-democratic regime in Russia. The main resistance was focused on laws, which limit human rights and which are generally common and fundamental in democracy. One of them was law against gay, lesbians and bisexual. Their rights are out of question in Russia. Another hot topic was pursuit of journalist and media in general. As I already mention, Sochi was the most expensive in history of Olympic Games, so there are concerns about corruption, environmental damage, exploitation of foreign workers, expropriation of land without adequate compensation, etc.. What was the reaction of public, politicians, sportsmen and organizations involved in protecting human rights? Some politicians and sportsmen boycotted games and some organizations came out against organizing games in Sochi. Do you think it is right and justifiable? Is It appropriate way how to face it and show own attitudes? I know it is hard to say, because it depends on certain circumstances. Basically in my opinion just boycott is not a good solution, because I'm a sportsman and I like sports. I even think that sport is a perfect tool how to fight against violating human rights, because it is unique event when nations from all over the world meet and compete in meaningful and peaceful way. It is also opportunity for promoting and supporting human rights, mutual understanding and respect. So politicians should come and give support their representatives. On the other hand, I must admit that there can be situations such as war, when boycotts are reasonable and well-founded. Very important question is, where are Olympic Games supposed to be held? In my opinion Olympi