As the family and political structures moved from the medieval feudal system, consisting of "medieval courtly love," which allowed for the "expression of sexual love by women," and of some allowance of participation by noblewomen in politics, to the more classical, "early modern state," regardless of class, all women saw a decrease in their personal and social options that men did not. Indicated by the sources used to represent the nobility and bourgeoisie, chastity became the female norm and "the relations of the sexes were restructured to one of female dependency and male domination." The voices of women diminished, as their "access to power became indirect and provisional." Ultimately, a clear division was made between the personal and private realm and with that "the modern relation of the sexes made its appearance" (Kelly, 47). Kelly's essay has been contested, yet, her "general claims about gender as an analytical category have offered compelling accounts of the relationship between Renaissance structures of economic exploitation and the oppression of women." Nonetheless, the category of women and their relationships in the Renaissance are topics far too complex to simply delve into blindly. Since all women did not fit into one category, nor did they share the same relationships, it would be an enormous task to approach them as such; therefore, some form of organization must be implemented in the study of women in the Renaissance. Thus, this part of the website attempts to distinguish those women living in the country from those living in the city, specifically focused on the family, education, and religion of women inhabiting popular culture. Still, it should be noted that these organizational categories are problematic. “Country acquired its modern meanings of a tract or region, and of a land or nation in the thirteenth century (Williams, appendix). “In Tindale in 1526 it is contrasted with the city: ‘tolde it in the cyte, and in the country'" (Mark v, 14). And by this time ‘city’ had becom