Imagine living in a society where everyone has the same objective – to be an idea person, they’re aiming to be the so-called center. The individuals who do not have the ability to achieve this “Center” have no option but to embody the grotesque. Whoever is not part of this center can be known as a “walking carnival”. The reason why these individuals are known as a “walking carnival” is simply because they are different. And since they are different, they fall under the label of “Other”. The other is produced based off of guidelines that were generated by the Center. Therefore, this makes it rather easy for the Center to ridicule the grotesque bodies (or the Other). Mikhail Bakhtin once said “The grotesque body, as we have often stressed, is a body in the act of becoming. It is never finished, never completed’ it is continually being built, created and builds and creates another body” (317) From this quote we can deduce that the center is always changing, and since the center creates the guidelines which the other has to meet, therefore the other is also always changing. There are many representations of the Other, however, a major one is Females. The Center has created stereotypes of the female grotesque body and their attributes. Now you may as yourself, “Why is there an ‘Other’?” Generally, the Other serves as a sole purpose to intrigue and entertain the Center. In U. A. Fanthorp’s “Not My Best Side”, in Ursula K. Le Guin’s “She Unnames Them” and finally, in Elizabeth Bishop’s “Pink Dog”, the females characters portrayed in these works do not fit the guidelines that were formed by the Center. This essay will argue how the theme of Feminism disobeys the guidelines of what the Other should have as attributes and Characteristics. This is demonstrated through the literary devices of parody, irony and personification, which makes each character, presented in these works an ellipsis since the woman are nor the center or the other which ultimately enables them to be undefined and therefore an e