What is the true and justifiable definition of virtue? What is knowledge? Is it possible to search for or already acquire knowledge of something without knowing how, where, and what to search for? And is this ability of possessing such knowledge an innate ability that has been retained from past incarnations or must it be learned and acquired in whatever current lifetime one is in? These are some of the many topics and questions which shall be discussed and evaluated throughout the progression of this essay. Knowledge is the ability to be able to give an account and justify the matter with what one knows, and for one to retain knowledge it requires belief and justification. Meno and Socrates' discussion of the origin of knowledge all begins with the Socratic dialogue of the attempt to define Virtue, to which it then leads to Meno's Paradox and Socrates' Theory of Recollection. Firstly, Meno proposes to Socrates' of the question being: ˜What is virtue?  to which Socrates simply replies that he does not know. Meno tries to depict virtue as being a different aspect for different people of all ages and genders. For example for men virtue is hurting enemies, loving friends and providing for others, while for women virtue is cleaning, cooking, and being a housewife. But Socrates' objects and claims that virtue must be common for all and that the definition should be a unitary sense of knowledge. This discussion then lead onto Meno's Paradox and Socrates' Theory of Recollection. The origin of Meno's Paradox is derived from Socrates' method of inquiry that became to be a problem which arose from one's attempt of gaining knowledge about whether if a certain act is virtuous or not, all without actually having the knowledge of what a virtue truly is. But Meno refutes this very argument of Socrates' with his own paradox, stating that a person is not able to discover virtue if they already know what it is, and also that one cannot discover