College Football, which is arguably the number one sport in the United States is making a giant transition at the end of this year. The NCAA is not paying athletes or growing the sport, but doing something that has been long awaited. A playoff system has been integrated into our beloved NCAA FBS college football division. Although this is what many called for, some believe this will hurt the sport and its athletes. So, should we have this playoff system? And if so, then how many teams should be involved? Many questions have risen and there is still much to decide. I have called for a playoff for a long time now that we are going to get one, it will make the sport of college football fair, more interesting, and help the schools make more money. A college football playoff system has been long awaited by many fans, including myself. I believe that we need this in order to grow the sport even more and to make it more interesting for fans. If you look at how our national champion is decided now days, it may not be all that fair. You've got teams such as the 2006 Boise State Broncos, 2008 Hawaii Warriors, and 2012 Northern Illinois Huskies who went undefeated or nearly undefeated and never even had a chance from the start to play for the national title. That is simply unfair and that is why we need a playoff system. With a playoff system, we would not have to worry about unfairness and all teams would have a somewhat equal chance of playing for the title. With our current system, only around 60 teams of 125 have any chance at making the national title game. This is unfair to many teams so that is why the system is flawed. Our current system, the BCS computer system, uses two human polls (AP and Harris), and one computerized ranking system to decide the top spots among college football's best. Although this seemed like a great idea when Florida State won the first BCS National Championship Game in 1998, it is obvious that the system is flawe