Biological warfare is, by definition, the use of any living organism or an infective component to cause disease or death in humans, animals, or plants.1 As opposed to bioterrorism, biological warfare is sanctioned by the state for the use of biochemical to cause destruction of life. These products are often altered to target a specific group of people. Biological weapons are alleged to be reproducing bodies that reproduce or replicate inside the host victims.2 There is a great amount of controversy over the use of this weapon, and in reality it is unsafe. It should be obvious that the human population is in danger with this weapon, and should fear it like they fear nuclear weapons. They are just as dangerous, if not more dangerous than nuclear weapons. Biological warfare is a danger due to its lack of controllability, and the fact that it is highly easy access ¦ not only this but it is morally unrighteous. 3 It is obvious that many people believe that bio warfare is a military advantage because it costs less, and works efficiently when utilized correctly. It is said that bio-weapons are cheaper than average ammo and artillery, along with the obviously pricey nuclear weapons. If one were to look at this from the point of view of someone on a budget they would think this is a good thing, but if one looked at it with a scientific point of view they would see the obvious dangers to this "cheap and efficient  product. The cost to use biological weapons over conventional is but a fraction of 1/2000th of the cost.4 The comparisons in price between bio weapons and nuclear, nerve-gas weapons, and conventional weapons are astonishing. The biological weapons only cost one dollar per kilometer.5 The danger of the cheapness is the fact that there are people out there that would create lateral damage due to the easy access to the produce. The low cost per square kilometer and the damage it could do in that one kilometer makes the thought of biolo