Undoubtedly, when it comes to enjoyment or satisfaction there is always the possibility of suffering, there are even those who think that this is part of love, or that the suffering experienced is called love. So a big question arises: is it necessary to suffer for love? It does not matter if a person is a man or woman, if that person does not accept that love is the source of life it’s simply not. The human heart was created to love, but it is so oscillating that one day, it can be in the clouds, and the next day is hurting, descends into the abyss; therefore assume that love and suffering even though they are two different concepts they go hand in hand, to the point that could be argued that the road to true love must necessarily be paved by obstacles. The writer, Schultz, defined love as source of life: “Love is...being happy for the other person when they are happy, Being sad for the person when they are sad, Being together in good times, And being together in bad times. Love is...An understanding so complete that you feel as if you are a part of the other person, accepting the other person just the way they are, and not trying to change them to be something else. Love is The fury of the storm, the calm in the rainbow.” Every human being wants to be happy. The real question and big question is, to know whether this happiness is possible and how. But is it not our deepest aspiration to love and be loved? What constitutes our happiness and our joy is our devotion and love we receive from others. People cannot truly love without sacrificing a part of the freedom that possess from the other. A research done by Austin shows that people are 35% more likely to become severely ill, or experience regular illness, if they are in an unhappy marriage. When people are satisfied lovingly, when things go towards their desired path, when loves and is loved...they enjoy an exquisitely plenitud. However, when the opposite case happens, w