In “Condemn the Crime, Not the Person” by June Tangney is a paper that asserts that the most fitting sentencing for a criminal, so they can reflect on it. Most people that commit crimes, have gotten public humiliation that is “shaming” sentences. Shaming sentences is designed to give the criminal sanction explicitly designed to induce feelings of shame. This means receiving humiliation from their neighbors, friends, and family members. It makes them feel ashamed, but it does not give them the opportunity to reflect on the mistakes that they have committed. The research indicates that a public humiliation is not helping the person to alter their criminal behavior. Public humiliation only made them feel powerless and worthless. In addition, a person must feel shame, and they tend to find hiding places or find defensive tactics to defend them. In the other hand, the person that did the crime and they need to do community services, most of them can reflect on what they did was wrong. I agree on what June Tangney had illustrated and shared in her writing, in regards to community services being a sufficient solution to improve their criminal behavior. It allows them to reflect on what they did, and they might not ever commit crimes again. First, I agree with June Tangney because I believe that community service helps people reflect on what have they did and did a reparative action. Community service is the type of unpaid work, intended to be of social use that the offender is required to do based on the article that Tangney wrote. As like June wrote, “research has shown that this sense of tension and regret typically motivates reparative action.” That piece of sentences has a strong meaning, and it delivers June’s opinion about the community service sentences. The community service program allows inmates an opportunity to give back to the community while at the same time supporting the Department’s restorative justice initia