The constitution wasn’t a document that just appeared out of thin air or was established on simple terms. A lot of time, effort, logical reasoning, etc. was put into the creation of this document. In fact it created a predicament where there was tension between states and commenced a national debate. Some states were in agreement with the ratification of the Constitution and others opposed it. These people were called federalists and the anti-federalists. The main arguments were, the constitution would benefit the lives of the people and others opposed and felt that it would violate their rights and that the government would become to powerful. Both sides brought up respectable arguments and standpoints. Political parties developed through custom and tradition. This debate between Federalists and Anti-federalists over the ratification of the constitution revealed the existence of differences of opinion of government these differences led to the formalities of the first two political parties: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. In terms of the Federalists, the Constitution was required to be in tact in order to safeguard the liberty and independence that the American Revolution had created. James Madison, one of the great Federalist leaders explained that the Constitution was designed to be a "republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government." The Anti-federalists anticipated that the Constitution would threaten to lead the United States down a place of political corruption. All three branches of the new central government threatened Anti-federalists' traditional belief in the importance of restraining government power. The anti-federalists opposed the Constitution of the United States for the main reason of the rights of the people being revoked or limited. Amos Singletree was a farmer, a person with a low social status, however he was still a citizen. He felt that is it Constitution was ratifi