Public school has undergone major reforms since years ago with many changes, especially with the curriculum it used. Furthermore, in the midst of the reforms, some believe that class size does not matter. Malcolm Gladwell, the author of Outliers, is the one who supports this argument. He cites in his book entitled David and Goliath that though really big class is a problem, the smaller one does not necessarily lead students to get better outcomes. He explains that teachers do not usually adjust their teaching style to the smaller class size, instead, they just work less. So, he thinks that the disadvantage of moderately big classes is not one after all. However, the fact has been spoken that size of a class really matters. A small class tends to achieve more good than a big class does which correlated with test outcomes, social engagement, and economy benefit. There was a research from National Assessment of Educational Progress to the American Psychological Association which shows that the smaller the class, the more the students are encouraged to engage in daily activities, discussions, and interactions. In addition, which includes the amount of effort put forth, initiative taken, and participation by a student. This can bring students to develop their non-cognitive skills. A small class is also make a positive teacher-student relationship. For example, imagine yourself a a college freshman or sophomore in college, and the class size is around fifty students. It will not be a very good class because the teacher attention can not be spread evenly between you and your peers. Nonetheless, When you are in a small class, the teachers can pay more attention to their students. This, usually leads students to try performing better because they get the extra attention that they might not have received in a larger class. There was another project called project STAR which shows a small class can make the students in it get higher test scor