The movie, "The Devil Wears Prada" touches on a very important and interesting case of conflict among women’s workforce and their behaviour within the work environment. It is shown how the younger colleagues often clash and being influenced by their older more experienced bosses. Interpersonal conflict is a disagreement between or among connected individuals who perceive their goals as incompatible. Conflict occurs when people, such as colleagues, perceive each other as interfering with the attainment of their own goals. Miranda has very strong qualities of a leader, but not only her and her behaviour within the organisation will be reviewed, but I also will be talking about Emily Charlton (Emily Blunt) and her managerial traits, and how they were influenced after Andrea Sachs (Anne Hathaway) took the lead. However, from the first sight Emily might appear as very neutral and is clearly demonstrated as not an obvious first choice to be distinguished as a manager. But after movie is watched again closely, her qualities as a manager and leader might become more obvious and noticeable. It is demonstrated how empowered Emily feels in the absence of Miranda, and it is also demonstrated how she takes charge when on the side she has Andrea, which is a newbie and everything she learns, all the knowledge she picks up is from Emily. In order to get an acceptance of her ruthless boss Andrea had to reconsider her plain style and change to something more elegant. On the other hand, Emily regards Andrea’s lack of knowledge and sense of style as a weakness and this influence the behaviour toward her. This gives us an impression about how cold and critical with the physical appearance the office environment is. An example in the film that shows this is when Emily says: "I mean, you get coffee (sneers) and you run errands. Yet I am in charge of her schedule, her appointments, and her expenses. And um, most importantly, I get to go with her to Paris for fashion week in the fall.” Almost belittling Andrea. (Devil; 00:17:35) “I will deal with this and you will go to Calvin Klein.” (Devil; 00:19:26) “I get 20 minutes for lunch, you get 15. When I come back, you can go.” The tone of the voice of this dialogue is very domineering and furthermore this dialogue is a clear representation of Emily’s self-vitalisation and centralisation, especially when she gives order and uses the word I to embrace her vitality within the organisation. However, this does not work all the time, but only when Andrea still feels like a newbie and lacks of experience. Therefore, it showcases the ability of Emily to appear as a manager from the start, but she is shown to lack the qualities to become and be reviewed as a legitimate leader. “However, this distinction between managers as traditional and rational while true leaders are charismatic is clearly an idealization and a rather simplistic one at that. In reality, leaders do find that they have to attend to often mundane administrative tasks and managers do have to lead those who report to them if they are to get anything done” Ralph Stacey, (2012). Mostly, Miranda can be seen with perpetually neutral expression on her façade, which in most cases regarded as an arrogance that is directed to her subordinates in most of the cases. Furthermore, her leadership is proved to be more powerful due to the way she uses her straight forward ordering voice and never has the need of demonstration of her powers. Miranda uses the delicate and calm tone of her voice and almost noticeable but very powerful body language and facial expression and therefore it is enough to showcase her privilege of not exercising the power, but being respectful and dreadful for most of the organisation. Priestly shows an autocratic leadership style throughout. Simply defined as “A ruler who has absolute power.” However, Miranda is not always like that, and is being engaged in other activities where she immerses into other styles as soon as she is put into more informal situation. For