A general rule taught throughout modern life is ‘quality over quantity’; however, what is to be said when there is both quantity and quality? I found myself asking this countless times while analyzing multiple reviews discussing the controversial issue of Arizona’s bill SB1070 in correlation with Ari Luis Palos’s documentary, Precious Knowledge. After collecting information from of different sources with various ideals on the subject, it can be seen that the arguments issued by supporters of SB1070 lack quantity and quality in numbers for actual reviews as well as for content in the reviews themselves. Looking into assessments from local, national, and Latina/o based sources, it is clear that when an argument has substantial evidence to support their claims, it is almost irrelevant how popular the source is on a national level. After analyzing multiple articles on the subject, all but one gave extensive details and background information on the topics of SB1070 and Precious Knowledge, and it is not surprising that the one source that gave the least amount of quantity and quality is the one source that is pro-SB1070. Though smaller publications that are more anchored towards the Latina/o community are expected to give more in depth and personal views on SB1070 and Precious Knowledge, it is remarkable to see that one of the most read and renown papers in the world, “The New York Times”, not only had the less than ten sentences to say about this extremely controversial issue, but also incorporated diction that can be seen as less than true to support their main/ only argument. The article reads, “...chariman of the State Senate’s Education Committee... is nothing but respectful when he visits a Mexican-American studies class. And he’s perfectly calm as he says, ‘When I look up at the wall and I see a poster of Che Guevara, who many of us think was a thug, and I don’t see anything on Benjamin Franklin, I have a problem