“Program evaluation, as a concept and process of weighing, interpreting, and subsequently making judgments about data collected from multiple components of programming" (Billings & Halstead). While the Canterbury District Health Board as cited by Fineout-Overholt & Johnston (2007), states that “evaluation is assessment of both processes and outcomes of a program or implementation." Irrespective of the fact that evaluation is the final step of Evidence Base Practice process, it should be an ongoing process, necessary all through the stages of EBP, to ensure that quality of plans and process. Evaluation of the evidence, implementation process and it’s effectiveness, before the dissemination to stakeholders, is an imperative. Hence, to ensure a comprehensive evaluation, certain factors have to be considered in the methodology and variables as it applies to the evidence sought in the project, it’s application and purpose, in order to yield the desired outcome for dissemination. These factors include; reasons for the evaluation, having a time frame, choosing the appropriate time to evaluate, who the evaluators will be and having an evaluation design or framework. It is also important to select an evaluation instrument, consider the data collection process, it’s analysis, manner in which results are reported, how they will be used and the costs of evaluation. In consideration of my choice of Evidence Base Practice project, which is using diet and exercise to control glycaemia and reduce complications in type 2 diabetes patients. The implementation logistics involved the use of strategic methods, such as health education of participants by nurses, dietitians, using power point presentations, healthcare model, leaflets, fliers, display of diet foods, measurements of weight and blood sugars, how to calculate food calories and the invitation of diet and exercise companies, to help motivate the patient’s participation in the p