We should not kill the remaining wolves in Norway, because what harm is a few wolves scattered enough that they are barely able to have pups, let alone a pack? That aside, the wolves are endangered, they are on the brink of extinction. If people continue to hunt them then we can assume the worst and soon say goodbye to them. In the past few years, the number of wolves in Norway has never gone up to a hundred. Before a hunting season begins, roughly fifty Norwegian wolves roam freely, but once it is over, there are only 20 left. Are wolves of that number really a threat to thousands of sheep who mostly die because of sickness, injuries and parasites? Are they? Say for example, if each wolf kills fifteen sheep each, then three hundred sheep would have lost their lives to wolves. That is not even a tenth of the 130,000 sheep that die annually in the wilderness. So, are they really a threat to livestock? The only thing they are threatening is the farmers’ wallets. If the farmers actually cared for their livestock, they would put them in fenced areas where they would be less likely to damage the fauna around them and where they would be safer from predators. Continuing on that note, if we kill a predator for doing its job, doing what it was made to do – and that is to eat weak animals (which in turn benefits the species because we all know it is a survival of the fittest on this world) – then shouldn’t we turn on each other too? We are at the top of the food chain. How do you think we got here? We kill livestock too, probably more than wolves do; we even kill apex predators for threatening our territory is that not what wolves do too? Despite being of higher intelligence, what drives wolves to eat sheep and "kill humans" (quotation marks because there hasn’t been any human who has been attacked by a wolf in years, and the last ‘documentation’ we have of it is a myth.) drives us as well, you can’t deny that. It is a survival