The philosophical sentiments of Plato provide a deep insight of what he believed as an ideal state. The thoughts of Plato are crucial in illustrating various attributes deemed as crucial in demonstrating the ideal relationship of people in government leadership and ordinary citizens. Essentially, a legitimate government is determined by four key elements, which include; political leaders, policies chosen depending on the size of the government, and the performance of public managers. Each of the four elements is regarded as significantly vital. Focusing on only one of these elements can lead to ignorance of some deep causes of underperformance, institutions that are poorly aligned with their missions, malfunctioning systems for choosing leaders, and less effective incentive systems. The deeper causes of underperformance need to be addressed too. The low performance in government occasionally provides little service for certainly too much money. These are some of the issues that need much attention in order to achieve a better or ideal state, as expressed by Plato. In this regard, disciplined policy direction, operational flexibility, and clear high performing guidelines are the guiding objectives of an ideal government structure. An organization should give a clear sense of policy direction and clarity of mission, thus undercutting efficiency and confidence of the public. In addition, great leadership sorts out issues of the most competent career executives retiring at an early age, leaving the government with unqualified personnel. It is the operations of the government that should be utilized to boost morale of the working personnel. According to Plato, a state usually consists of a certain number of individuals who have various requirements settle in one place. Everyone in a society has different requirements and different needs. The most appropriate way to attain all that is by working together. The society first must achieve the basic needs that are food, shelter and then clothing.