Abstract This paper explores the argument between a professor who’s an Atheist and his student who’s a Christian. An article was posted by Patricia Bridewell on her website (www.patrish.com) sent to her by Phil Mathews. Phil Mathews was not the author of the said article. There will be three premises provided supporting the conclusion of the Christian student. The author then concluded that the argument is inductive leading to some of the fallacies found. The author found 4 (four) logical fallacies present on both side of the argument: (1) Loaded Questions, (2) Appeal to Authority, (3) Appeal to Ignorance, (4) Ad Hominem-Abusive. This paper then, gave out reasons, mainly according to the article, that faith on something that one cannot be proven by science is a way to believe that something really does exist. The author, then, gave out reasons why the argument of both sides are weak. Keywords: ad hominem, inductive, atheist Does God Really Exist? In the article, "The Atheist: Professor vs the Christian Student," posted on Patricia Bridewell’s blogspot www.patrish.com), wherein an Atheist professor and a Christian student argue whether or not God does exist, there came 3 (three) premises: (Premise 1): The Christian student claimed that the professor is working on the premise of duality. The professor sees God as something he can measure through giving out duality; a good God and a bad God. When, science can’t even fully understand the things they use to measure things. (Premise 2): The Christian student claimed that God, according to the Bible, is letting bad things happen, to tell if people can choose good or evil by their own free will. (Premise 3): Finally, the student claimed that if God is non-existent according to the five senses, then, the professor’s brain, in which the five senses cannot prove exists, is non-existent as well. The conclusion would be, according to the argument made by the professor and the Christian s