William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" has been shot and performed in front of an audience various times. What is intriguing is the unmistakable contrasts that the different directors or screenwriter can make in the same play through various film attempts. Three adaptations of Hamlet, the exemplary, long-term most loved featuring and coordinated by Laurence Olivier, the 1996 rendition featuring and coordinated by Kenneth Branagh and the latest variant, discharged in 2000 featuring and starred by Campbell Scott. Each of the three versions recount the same story, yet with distinctive subtleties which change the vibe of the motion picture. These most clear contrasts can be found in every motion pictures setting and time period, script and the way in which the individual characters are depicted. The primary contrast between the three motion pictures is the thing that strikes the viewer promptly, the setting and time period. The first play was situated in Denmark in the 1500s. Olivier's variant is by all accounts set in about the same time. The way that the palace is lit by candles, the style of the characters closets and the absence of firearms as weapons all fall in precisely with the time period initially settled by Shakespeare. Branagh's form is by all accounts set some place in the late nineteenth century. The 2000 rendition, coordinating and featuring Campbell Scott takes the biggest takeoff from Shakespeare's opportunity period and setting. The apparel, however not the same as today is significantly more cutting edge than either Olivier's or Branagh's. The men wear suits and ties, while the ladies appear to be robed in sort of outfit wore by ladies in the late 1800s or mid-1900s.All great adaptations of Hamlet but the one that stands out the most is Kenneth Branagh interpretations of Shakespeare’s greatest play. Kenneth Branagh, a popular motion picture maker, is known for his exceptional thoroughness when directing. In his adjustment of S