book

The Good and Evil of Humanity

21 Pages 670 Words 1557 Views

Humans are naturally evil, and must have some form of government to keep peace amongst each other. Hobbes explained how mankind is not social. Without a ruler, there will be no peace. The government’s actions are just. He stated that humans are all equal, and that “the difference between man and man is not so considerable”, but the hopes we have to achieve goals and be successful, makes us evil. Without a “common power” or government to keep peace and be a reminder to be reasonable and moral, there will be war and violence. Us, as humans, would not be able to function peacefully together. I agree with Hobbes because naturally, humans are evil. History has proved this to be accurate countless times. We are greedy, selfish, and cruel. The only way we maintain peace, is by having a common power or a government reminding and enforcing us to. In the Leviathan, Hobbes mentions how there are two types of people; the modest and the vainglorious. The modest people being the ones who are content with a reasonable level of power, and the vainglorious always seeking more power. Hobbes goes on to explain how we are uncertain of how to tell in advance if a man is modest or vainglorious. This results in a perpetual fear of being unprepared for an attack by the vainglorious seeking more power. Consequently, the “modest” determine that striking first is the best way to avoid being attacked. This makes for a circle of fear and results in a state of war. “To this war of every man against every man, this also in consequent; that nothing can be unjust. The notions of right and wrong, justice and injustice have there no place. Where there is no common power, there is no law, where no law, no injustice. Force, and fraud, are in war the cardinal virtues.” In a state of nature there is no common power, government, or established laws. Without these, we would not know right from wrong. There would be no justice for the victims. This would ca

Read Full Essay