Minor literature is when a minority author writes in a major language of his nation. Deleuze and Guattari (1986), in their book “What is a Minor Literature?” determines three main characteristics of this literature, and one of them is the connection of individual concerns to politics (p. 1). Everything, in the minor literature, is linked to the whole social environment and political immediacy. A novel “Stone Dreams,” by Akram Aylisli (2012), contains political and revolutionary feature of minor literature and demonstrates oppression of minor Armenian population in Baku and Sumgait in 1988-1990. Mikail Mamedov (2014), in the essay “The Stone Dreams Scandal”, demonstrates current situation after publication of this novel and reasons why Aylisli’s novel became target of critiques. Since Mikail Mamedov, in “Stone Dreams Scandal,” provides strong evidence on accusations against Aylisli and truly analyzes cause of people’s criticism, his essay is very valuable and relevant. However, his last argument about the role of literature in the resolution of controversies is not persuasive and reasonable because literature cannot solve all problems. This essay includes Mamedov’s approach to “Stone Dreams” novel and evaluates his arguments that are presented in “Stone Dreams Scandal”. The article “Stone Dreams Scandal” analyzes a political uproar that occurred in Baku in 2013. In this essay, Mikail Mamedov represents positive sides of “Stone Dreams” and claims that this novel caused such a big because Akram Aylisli has touched on a taboo that he was not supposed; therefore, people criticize him being biased (p. 46-47). In “Stone Dreams,” Aylisli described the victimization of Armenians who lived in Baku and Sumgait in late 20th century. He depicts persecution of Armenians by Azerbaijanis who were forced to leave Armenia and local Azerbaijanis who tried to help Armenians in Baku. For centuries, conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia has been continuing, especially the Karabakh conflict; thus, when such a political novel was published by Aylisli, it caused such a dangerous accusation against writer’s family and himself. In addition, Mamedov, in his essay, also mentioned some significant works that are devoted to Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, and they could have an important role in addressing issues. According to Mamedov, literature works can achieve more important results in the resolution of conflicts rather than academic books because of its broader audience (p. 55). In “Stone Dreams Scandal,” Mamedov provided valid and reliable evidences and achieved to demonstrate that Aylisli was not partial. Although his proofs are powerful and relevant, his initial evidence is not as much persuasive as other two arguments. Firstly, Mamedov claims Aylisli wanted to depic